IS YOUR CELLPHONE CAPABLE OF CAUSING A  DEADLY BRAIN TUMOR?

Goldhaber Research Associates • Nov 26, 2018

In the January, 2010, November, 2010 and June, 2011 issues of this newsletter, I raised the question of whether or not our cell phones were capable of causing a rare form of brain cancer developed from a glioma tumor. While solid research findings were scarce, I did report on the UN's World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)'s decision to classify cellphones as "possibly carcinogenic" based on scientific data linking the heaviest users of cellphones to possible brain cancer. IARC then proceeded to label cellphones as a Category 2B device, meaning cellphones are possibly carcinogenic. The U.S. reaction to the WHO study and recommendations, as provided by both the FDA and the FCC, the agencies responsible in the U.S. for regulating the cellphone industry, was to basically ignore the WHO report and issue their own statement declaring that no significant body of research has shown cellphones to be dangerous to users. This conclusion was slightly, if not significantly, jolted when earlier this month, the National Toxicology Program released the results of a decades long study of how rats/rodents responded to heavy doses of radiation from cellphones. They found positive but relatively modest evidence that radio waves from some types of cellphones could raise the risk that male rats develop brain cancer.

While the scientists behind the report stand by their overall conclusion, it is important to note that the exposure levels and durations were much greater than what you or I typically encounter when we use our phones. Further, since the study began in the Clinton administration, some of the cellphones used in the study are from old technology not in use today. Not to be deterred, the Toxicology Program is continuing its studies with newer phones. Tune in!

Some localities (e.g., Maine and the City of Berkely) have passed legislation requiring cellphones sold in those localities to have a warning about the amount of radiation associated with the use of these phones (the actual term used is the "Specific Absorption Rate" or SAR). As a service to our readers, we have decided to let you know which cellphones emit the greatest amount of radiation and which the least. If you are worried about even the possibility of a link between radiation from cellphones and brain cancer, you may want to consider buying a cellphone from the "least" radiation list. The FCC suggests (without any evidence) that we limit our exposure to 1.6 watts per kilogram. Regardless of your level of concern, I continue to recommend that all of us reduce the amount of time on these devices (and get back in touch with good old-fashioned face-to-face "warm flesh not cold plastic" communication) and for any use of the cellphone, use a head set and keep the phone itself away from your body, especially your ears/head.

By Gerald Goldhaber 07 May, 2024
Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized strict limits on PFAS, so-called “forever chemicals”, in drinking water that will require utilities to reduce them to the lowest level they can be reliably measured. Officials say this will reduce exposure for 100 million people and help prevent thousands of illnesses, including cancers.
By Gerald Goldhaber 16 Apr, 2024
Could that colorful stash of cleaning supplies under your kitchen sink, in your broom closets and around the washer and dryer contain toxic compounds that might significantly affect your health and the environment? Unfortunately, for many common household cleaning products, the answer is too often “yes.”
By Gerald Goldhaber 13 Mar, 2024
Since the pandemic, when E-Bikes first became a big deal in NYC, with almost everyone demanding that food, toilet paper and other products be brought to their doorsteps, E-Bikes have become one of the leading causes of fires in NYC. What are E-Bikes and why are they so dangerous. First of all, an E-Bike is an electric bicycle, typically powered by a lithium-ion battery, known mostly for its longevity, lasting typically ten times longer than lead-acid batteries, often exceeding 5 years. Lithium-ion batteries are generally safe. If you follow proper storage, charging, and discarding procedures, they are unlikely to fail or catch fire. However, at least in NYC, where there are over 65,000 E-Bikes, mostly driven by food-delivery personnel working for companies such as Uber Eats or Grubhub, and even work commuters, that is not always the case.
By Gerald Goldhaber 05 Feb, 2024
If you are like most Americans suffering through this nasty, snow and ice-driven extremely cold winter, you probably have dreams of flying somewhere warm to lounge on the beach while sipping margaritas (that's my tribute to the late Jimmy Buffett ). If you can afford the time and money to fly away to your dream winter holiday in the sun, you may still be worrying if your flight to paradise is safe. And worry you should, especially if you are booked on a Boeing 737 Max 9 aircraft.
By Gerald Goldhaber 29 Nov, 2023
Imagine a group of 10-year olds sitting in a darkened room, with a bunch of their "friends" engaged in a discussion about whom to kill while playing a game of Russian Roulette. This is NOT a pretend game. Virtual reality goggles are marketed to children as young as ten years old. These goggles and other smart toys are listed in the 38th edition of Trouble in Toyland, the annual listing of holiday toys that pose hazards for children, released by the Massachusetts chapter of the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) If you have doubts about the safety of such "hi-tech" toys, last month, an 11-year-old girl was kidnapped by a man she encountered while playing a game online. Fortunately, she was found safe a short time later, about 135 miles away from her home. The game, Roblox, is one of the most popular mobile games this year.
By Gerald Goldhaber 08 Nov, 2023
Last month in this newsletter, I wrote about several of our favorite foods that, while they are legally sold in the U.S., despite known health issues associated with them, have been banned throughout Europe, Canada and other developed nations, including Australia, Japan and New Zealand. One of the chemicals I wrote about was Brominated Vegetable Oil or BVO whose main ingredient, Bromine, the element found in brominated flame retardants, can build up in the body and potentially lead to memory loss, as well as skin and nerve problems. BVO is most commonly found in smaller grocery store brands and regional beverages, including some Food Lion-brand sodas, some Walmart branded Great Value-brand sodas, and Sun Drop citrus soda, manufactured by the makers of Dr. Pepper. It keeps the citrus flavoring in fruit-flavored beverages from floating to the top of the drink.
By Gerald Goldhaber 05 Oct, 2023
1. Skittles. Mars Co , manufacturer of Skittles, was named in a class action lawsuit filed in California last year claiming that Skittles contains titanium dioxide, used by Mars to make its Skittles look brighter and more colorful, while at the same time causing irritation to the eyes, nose and throat and, more seriously, having the potential for causing reproductive damage in humans. The European Union, which has banned Skittles, claims that titanium dioxide may also be a human carcinogen. 2. Mountain Dew & Fresca . Americans who “do the Dew” might be surprised to learn the product contains brominated vegetable oil. BVO is banned in Japan and the European Union because it contains bromine, the element found in brominated flame retardants, which can build up in the body and potentially lead to memory loss, as well as skin and nerve problems. The grapefruit-flavored soda, Fresca, also contains the ingredient. 3. Kraft Stove Top Stuffing . Kraft Stove Top stuffing might make weeknight dinners easier, but it also contains the same BHT discussed earlier and found in American breakfast cereals, including Honey Bunches of Oats and even the popular Wheat Thins, as well as BHA, which as we have already seen, at high doses causes cancer in rats, mice and hamsters, thus resulting in bans in the EU, Japan and elsewhere. 4. Little Debbie Swiss Rolls. Products in the European Union containing Yellow 5 and Red 40 carry warnings that they cause adverse effects in children, but you won’t find that warning on a box of Little Debbie Swiss Rolls in the U.S. Norway and Austria have banned the snack cakes outright. Some cereals, such as Lucky Charms, also use Yellow 5, Yellow 6 and Red 40, despite being known to cause itching and hives for some. 5. Ritz Crackers and Coffee-mate. Trans fats were officially banned in the U.S. in 2018; however, some trans fats such as partially hydrogenated soybean and cottonseed oils can still be found in popular products such as Ritz Crackers, Coffee-mate creamers and even those buttery Pillsbury Biscuits. These ingredients are also banned in Switzerland, Austria, Hungary, Iceland, Norway and Denmark. I could go on but you get the picture. As the Warnings Doctor, my advice to you is the same advice I got from my Jewish grandmother: "If it's from the farm, it's probably great for you, but if it's from a factory, not so great!"
By Gerald Goldhaber 05 Sep, 2023
What are PFAS? PFAS are a group of manmade chemicals used in a vast number of consumer and industrial products. They’re often referred to as “forever chemicals,” because most don’t break down. PFAS stands for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, which contain a strong carbon-fluorine bond that allows them to accumulate over time in the environment and in the bodies of animals and people, posing health risks. PFAS chemicals might also be thought of as “everywhere chemicals,” since they’ve become so common in the products we use every day.
By Gerald Goldhaber 03 Aug, 2023
A new energy drink has taken the market for such beverages by storm and have achieved a cult like status thanks in no small part to the fame of the beverage's creators, YouTube stars Logan Paul and KSI, who together have over 40 million subscribers. The drink is branded Prime Energy and is a highly caffeinated beverage in brightly colored cans with flavors such as Ice Pop and Tropical Punch.
By Gerald Goldhaber 06 Jul, 2023
A month ago, I had no idea what AirNow was or what its ratings indicated. Today, it is an App on my IPhone that tells me the air quality rating for a given city at a given time. AirNow's scale ranges from 0-500. The higher the AQI value, the greater the level of air pollution and the greater the health concern. For example, an AQI value under 50 represents good air quality, a rating between 50-100 is moderately acceptable, a rating between 100 and 150 is unhealthy for sensitive groups (e.g., elderly or very young people, folks with lung or heart conditions, etc.), a rating of 150-200 is unhealthy for most people (and is typically called the Red Zone), 200-300 is very unhealthy and over 300 is hazardous for everyone. Let me repeat: the rating in Buffalo was 179, clearly in the danger zone of unhealthy for most people.
Show More
Share by: