YOUR CLOTHING MAY BE TOXIC

CNN once conducted an experiment whose goal was to find out if it was possible to eliminate the threat of toxic pesticides used by farmers to grow many of our fruits and vegetables. The idea behind the experiment was that by the time these foods were on sale at our local supermarkets, they would have been removed by whatever means people in the food chain do to remove deadly toxins. CNN arranged to use a power washer to hose down several non-organic conventional fruits and vegetables at a local supermarket, foods that were exposed to pesticides at some point (or points) in their developmental process from farmer to our tables. After power washing all of the produce in a large section of the store, CNN removed samples and had them assessed for the presence of and amounts of (if any) of toxic pesticides. To cut to the chase, CNN found that virtually all of the pesticides (and their residue) were still on the targeted foods. CNN concluded that power washing made no significant difference in the removal of potentially toxic pesticides and chemicals.

This week, I was asked to address the topic of potential hazards associated with the clothes we wear often on a daily basis. My research revealed that much of our commonly worn clothing is coated with seriously toxic chemicals, some examples of which I will detail later in this newsletter. Further, just like the fruits and vegetables sprayed with pesticides, the chemicals on our clothing are also virtually impossible to remove, thus exposing us on an almost daily basis to not just these toxic chemicals, but to the daily, and often accumulated risk of exposure to deadly carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, risks to our kidneys, livers, reproductive and DNA issues, as well as serious environmental damage.

Before we explore some of these potentially deadly toxins in our clothing, let’s ask the leadoff question: What benefits are we trying to achieve with our clothing (besides just following God’s orders from the Garden of Eden? Think, for a minute about how many of you wouldn’t hesitate to desire whiter sheets or underwear with stains removed, wrinkle free handkerchiefs and tablecloths without any shrinkage, or water-resistant or even stain resistance for our favorite jeans or sweaters, or proper tanning for our leather clothes (and even couches)! After all, we take all of these benefits for granted without even one thought about how they are achieved. Well, the rest of this newsletter hopefully will shed some light on these “benefits” and may give you some pause about what you wear and how you take care of your clothing.

Lets’s start with conventional cotton (shirts, sheets, pants, handkerchiefs, etc.). Cotton is grown with genetically modified seeds and sprayed heavily with Roundup (in which the primary ingredient is glyphosate, linked directly to cancer. Many textiles contain chlorine bleach, formaldehyde, VOC’s (volatile organic compounds, PFC’s (per fluorinated chemicals), ammonia and/or other harmful chemicals. Additionally, heavy metals, PVC, and resins, which are involved in dyeing and printing processes are used. There are toxic chemicals used to make clothing wrinkle or shrinkage-free, flame resistant, waterproof, stain resistant, mildew resistant, or cling free. All fabrics can accept these toxic finished, so to avoid them, you need to specifically select products that haven’t been chemically finished. Without going into the science, some chemicals used in detergents eventually break down into a form which accumulate in the environment via the water supply and are highly toxic to fish and ocean wildlife.

Here are a few options that can help you avoid or at least minimize yours and our environment’s exposure to deadly toxins and chemicals:

1. Look for GOT-certified organic cotton and wool--free of pesticides, herbicides, NPE’s and GMO’s and dyed without harmful chemicals such as chlorine bleach, formaldehyde and heavy metals. 2. Look for clothing made with Tencel which is made from the cellulose extracted from eucalyptus, a renewable resource. Choose Tencel over rayon or bamboo textiles, both of which are created using heavily toxic chemicals.

If neither these two options (or others I haven’t listed here) are not available for you, perhaps I can refer you to the section of Genesis that precedes the appearance of the snake and where we find Adam and Eve relying upon leaves (hopefully leaves without toxins).

You may be thinking: Surely our government regulators are on top of this and will prevent our clothing from attacking us! If, especially during the Trump era of deregulatory frenzy, you think that such agencies as the FDA, EPA and CPSC are protecting us, I suggest you read the past issues of any major newspaper in the past year to see how Trump has systematically engaged in a deregulatory frenzy that has eliminated many rules and regulations specifically intended to keep us safe. I will address the failure of our regulatory agencies to protect us in the next issue of this newsletter

By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber August 7, 2025
From July 3–4, 2025, Central Texas—especially Kerr County and the Guadalupe River basin—experienced catastrophic flash flooding that claimed over 130 lives, including children and staff at Camp Mystic. As grief and outrage settle, survivors and officials alike are questioning whether enough was done to warn those most at risk.
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber July 9, 2025
On June 22, 2025, Governor Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 25 (SB25), known as the Make Texas Healthy Again Act. Beginning January 1, 2027, Texas will require prominent on-pack warning labels whenever food sold in the state contains any of 44 specific additives—including synthetic colorants like Red 40, Yellow 5, Blue 1, titanium dioxide, bleached flour, and partially hydrogenated oils. The mandated label must declare the following:
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber May 27, 2025
The FDA is delaying implementation of a rule that would require food companies to print nutritional information on the front labels of their products. The proposed rule was developed by President Biden’s Administration, with a comment period scheduled to close on May 16. The rule is designed to help consumers make better choices to avoid chronic health problems. Such problems—and consumer choices about nutrition—are things President Trump’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has repeatedly touted. Even though hundreds of comments have been filed about the proposed rule, Kennedy’s Food and Drug Administration is delaying the close of the comment period by 60 days. Most of the comments filed so far have come from food companies and food industry trade organizations. “ A 60-day comment period extension allows adequate time for interested parties to submit comments while also not significantly delaying rulemaking on the important issues in the proposed rule ,” according to the FDA’s announcement about the delay. 
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber April 30, 2025
Car accidents are a leading cause of injury and death worldwide, yet the safety measures designed to protect occupants in these life-or-death situations have long ignored a critical reality: women are more likely to be severely injured or killed in crashes than men. This disparity isn't rooted in biology alone—it’s also a result of a troubling oversight in the automotive industry’s safety testing protocols. For decades, crash-test dummies, which serve as proxies for human passengers in simulated collisions, have been modeled after the average male physique, leaving women out of the equation entirely. The Alarming Data Gap The implications of this gender gap in safety testing are both staggering and infuriating. Women, on average, have different body compositions than men—they tend to be shorter, lighter, and have different muscle distributions and bone densities. These physiological differences mean that women’s bodies interact with car safety features—such as seat belts, airbags, and headrests—in distinct ways. When vehicles aren’t tested with dummies that accurately represent female anatomy, crucial data about how to better protect women in crashes is simply ignored. Studies have revealed the dire consequences of this exclusion. Research from the University of Virginia found that women are 47% more likely to sustain serious injuries in car accidents compared to men, even when accounting for variables like seatbelt usage and crash severity. Women are also significantly more likely to suffer whiplash injuries due to the positioning of headrests, which are often designed with men’s neck dimensions in mind. These statistics aren’t just numbers—they represent lives cut short, families broken, and untold suffering that could have been mitigated with equitable safety testing.
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber April 14, 2025
Recent budget cuts at the Health and Safety Science Services (HSSS) have sent shockwaves through the scientific and public health communities, threatening the very infrastructure designed to protect us from disease outbreaks, food contamination, and medical crises. These cuts have affected food inspectors, vaccine scientists, Alzheimer’s researchers, and experts studying bird flu, among others—positions that are essential to ensuring public safety and advancing critical medical research. The consequences of these decisions will be dire, potentially reversing years of progress and exposing society to increased health risks.
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber March 12, 2025
As Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DGE) pushes for sweeping reforms and cost-cutting across federal agencies, concerns are mounting over the impact on critical public safety roles. Among the most alarming areas affected is the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), where staff reductions may threaten the lives of millions of air travelers. The DGE, established with a mandate to streamline government operations and reduce bureaucratic waste, has come under fire for its aggressive downsizing tactics. Critics warn that essential safety personnel, including air traffic controllers, are being cut under the guise of efficiency, leaving the nation's airspace dangerously understaffed.
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber February 11, 2025
Biden Administration former Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, on his way out of office, issued a Surgeon General's Advisory calling for new warnings on alcoholic beverages related to the cancer risk from consuming alcoholic beverages. Given that most individuals are unaware of the connection that consumption of alcoholic beverages can increase the risk for at least seven types of cancer, Murthy said in his advisory: "Given the conclusive evidence on the cancer risk from alcohol consumption and the Office of the Surgeon General's responsibility to inform the American public of the best available scientific evidence, the Surgeon General recommends an update to the Surgeon General's warning label for alcohol-containing beverages to include a cancer risk warning."
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber December 2, 2024
In my best-selling book, Murder, Inc.: How Unregulated Industry Kills or Injures Thousands of Americans Every Year...And What You Can Do About It , I propose a safety triad consisting of three components: manufacturers, regulators and consumers. All three must function properly in order to keep us safe. Manufacturers must produce and market safe (or safe as possible) products and warn us about any potential hazards so that we can make informed choices about whether or not to purchase their product and/or how to use it safely. Regulators , by imposing and implementing necessary rules and regulations, should hold manufacturers accountable for the above stated actions and to endure that they engage in "principled disclosure" by warning us about any potential hazards and dangers associated with their products. And, finally, Consumers , especially in the absence of well-meaning manufacturers or competent, well-intentioned regulators, must be highly diligent by researching products and learning about potential hazards prior to buying and/or using them. All three, manufacturers, regulators and consumers, must perform their jobs or the safety triad may fail to protect us and our loved ones. Think of a three-legged stool that distributes the weight of a person sitting on the stool, equally among the three legs. But what would happen if we leaned heavily to one side of the stool, essentially spreading the weight that was once borne by three legs to the two legs remaining braced to the floor. Unfortunately the third leg is no longer contributing to the stability of the stool, which may actually collapse because the two remaining legs may not be able to handle the amount of weight that was intended to be equally distributed among all three legs. 
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber November 15, 2024
If you or anyone in your family has used, uses or plans to use such over the counter (OTC) remedies for the flu or common cold as Theraflu, Robitussin, NyQuil, DayQuil, Mucinex, Sudafed or even some versions of Tylenol or Advil, you may want to read this newsletter very carefully.
By Gerald Goldhaber October 2, 2024
In an unprecedented, but, according to many social scientists and parents, a long overdue action, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, in a June editorial in the New York Times, called for a warning label to be placed on all social media platforms. In the words of the Surgeon General:
Show More