TRUMP USES NAFTA NEGOTIATIONS TO UNDERMINE NEEDED FOOD WARNINGS

Donald Trump hasn’t hidden his disdain for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), but now it is revealed in a recent New York Times story (March 21 2018, Pg.A-1,9) that the Trump Administration is trying to block an effort by other members of NAFTA (especially Mexico and Canada) from implementing highly conspicuous warnings to consumers about junk food containing high amounts of sugar, salt and fat. The new warnings being discussed by representatives from Mexico, Canada, Brazil, Peru, Uruguay, Argentina and Columbia are modeled after the apparently highly successful use by Chile, since 2016, of colors, shapes and easily understood symbols, including a black stop sign symbolizing dangerous amounts of sugar, salt or fat. (See Figure 1)

The Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) predictably is arguing for voluntary labeling programs and was quoted by the Times as stating it “supports a modernized NAFTA that will ensure standards are based on science, minimize unnecessary trade barriers, and benefit consumers in all three countries.” Although the U.S. Trade Representative’s spokesman, Emily Davis, told the Times, “the United States supports science-based labeling that is truthful and not misleading,” the degree of collusion between the Trump Administration and the GMA (which consists of executives from, among others, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo). For example, the Trump Administration, after the FDA implemented major changes to its food and nutritional label requirements (set to go into effect July, 2018), has delayed these vitally needed changes until January, 2020, claiming industry needed more time to produce the new labels. This is a patently ridiculous claim, which could lead to the death of thousands of diabetics from heart disease. What could possibly be untruthful or “misleading” about a food label that conspicuously and clearly tells the truth about the amount of sugar, salt and fat in a food product!

In several prior issues of this newsletter (e.g., March, 2013, July, 2014 and June, 2017), I have pointed out the dangers of sugary drinks and other products and the need for clear labeling, including warnings to help consumers understand what they are eating or drinking. This is very important because the FDA has determined that 77% of consumers actually pay attention to food labels while they are shopping. I have even recommended to the FDA that food products not only list the total amount of added sugar (which is now part of the delayed label implementation) but that they also list the amount of sugar in TEASPOONS INSTEAD OF GRAMS since only 5% of Americans understand the metric system. Why is the GMA insisting on using the metric system when they know this is like speaking Greek to a nation that mostly speaks English! Their answer is laughable. They told the FDA that they are actually doing a service to Americans by helping them to learn the metric system. The truth is that the GMA doesn’t want us to know how much sugar is in our food. If you knew the average 20 ounce bottle of a sweetened soft drink (whose label lists 60 grams of sugar) actually has 15 teaspoons of sugar , how many of those drinks would you consume?

When I first started writing about the need for better food labeling and warnings, the FDA reported that 70% of us were overweight and 33% of us were obese. Today, 70% of us are still overweight, but the rate of obesity has increased to 40% . (FYI, obesity is defined as having a body mass index of 30% or more.) Given the dramatic increase in obesity in America over the last decade, perhaps the GMA will finally recognize that our current food labeling system, despite the high number of Americans who look at the label, is not effective. Or, have they decided, along with the Trump Administration, that once again in America, industry must put PROFITS OVER SAFETY!


By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber April 14, 2025
Recent budget cuts at the Health and Safety Science Services (HSSS) have sent shockwaves through the scientific and public health communities, threatening the very infrastructure designed to protect us from disease outbreaks, food contamination, and medical crises. These cuts have affected food inspectors, vaccine scientists, Alzheimer’s researchers, and experts studying bird flu, among others—positions that are essential to ensuring public safety and advancing critical medical research. The consequences of these decisions will be dire, potentially reversing years of progress and exposing society to increased health risks.
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber March 12, 2025
As Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DGE) pushes for sweeping reforms and cost-cutting across federal agencies, concerns are mounting over the impact on critical public safety roles. Among the most alarming areas affected is the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), where staff reductions may threaten the lives of millions of air travelers. The DGE, established with a mandate to streamline government operations and reduce bureaucratic waste, has come under fire for its aggressive downsizing tactics. Critics warn that essential safety personnel, including air traffic controllers, are being cut under the guise of efficiency, leaving the nation's airspace dangerously understaffed.
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber February 11, 2025
Biden Administration former Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, on his way out of office, issued a Surgeon General's Advisory calling for new warnings on alcoholic beverages related to the cancer risk from consuming alcoholic beverages. Given that most individuals are unaware of the connection that consumption of alcoholic beverages can increase the risk for at least seven types of cancer, Murthy said in his advisory: "Given the conclusive evidence on the cancer risk from alcohol consumption and the Office of the Surgeon General's responsibility to inform the American public of the best available scientific evidence, the Surgeon General recommends an update to the Surgeon General's warning label for alcohol-containing beverages to include a cancer risk warning."
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber December 2, 2024
In my best-selling book, Murder, Inc.: How Unregulated Industry Kills or Injures Thousands of Americans Every Year...And What You Can Do About It , I propose a safety triad consisting of three components: manufacturers, regulators and consumers. All three must function properly in order to keep us safe. Manufacturers must produce and market safe (or safe as possible) products and warn us about any potential hazards so that we can make informed choices about whether or not to purchase their product and/or how to use it safely. Regulators , by imposing and implementing necessary rules and regulations, should hold manufacturers accountable for the above stated actions and to endure that they engage in "principled disclosure" by warning us about any potential hazards and dangers associated with their products. And, finally, Consumers , especially in the absence of well-meaning manufacturers or competent, well-intentioned regulators, must be highly diligent by researching products and learning about potential hazards prior to buying and/or using them. All three, manufacturers, regulators and consumers, must perform their jobs or the safety triad may fail to protect us and our loved ones. Think of a three-legged stool that distributes the weight of a person sitting on the stool, equally among the three legs. But what would happen if we leaned heavily to one side of the stool, essentially spreading the weight that was once borne by three legs to the two legs remaining braced to the floor. Unfortunately the third leg is no longer contributing to the stability of the stool, which may actually collapse because the two remaining legs may not be able to handle the amount of weight that was intended to be equally distributed among all three legs. 
By Dr. Gerald Goldhaber November 15, 2024
If you or anyone in your family has used, uses or plans to use such over the counter (OTC) remedies for the flu or common cold as Theraflu, Robitussin, NyQuil, DayQuil, Mucinex, Sudafed or even some versions of Tylenol or Advil, you may want to read this newsletter very carefully.
By Gerald Goldhaber October 2, 2024
In an unprecedented, but, according to many social scientists and parents, a long overdue action, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, in a June editorial in the New York Times, called for a warning label to be placed on all social media platforms. In the words of the Surgeon General:
By Gerald Goldhaber September 5, 2024
If you are one of the millions of Americans who recently purchased one of several Boar's Head Deli Products, you may have bought a product containing deadly listeria bacteria. At least nine people have died and 57 have been hospitalized from a listeria outbreak linked to deli meat, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In late July, Boar’s Head, a deli meat and cheese company, expanded a previously announced recall to include at least 7 million pounds of deli products the company says may have been contaminated by listeria amid a nationwide outbreak. The recall spans 71 products and includes meat meant to be sliced at retail delis along with prepackaged meat and poultry products sold at retail locations, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
By Gerald Goldhaber August 6, 2024
In my best-selling book, Murder, Inc.: How Unregulated Industry Kills or Injures Thousands of Americans Every Year...And What You Can Do About It (Hartford, Ct.:PYP Press, 2020), I discuss the need for "principled disclosure" from corporations about potential hazards that could hurt or kill us. I also discuss the role we as consumers play by seeking information about those hazards and finally, the role various regulatory agencies must play to initiate and enforce meaningful regulations on industry so that they do, indeed, engage in "principled disclosure" (i.e., tell the truth). In order to carry out its mandate, any regulatory agency or department charged with the responsibility of protecting the general public or consumers or workers and so on, must be empowered to both set the safety and hazard warnings rules and take aggressive, impactful action when they are not followed. Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a landmark 6-3 vote last month, overturned a 60-year old decision, colloquially known as "Chevron", which has the potential to undermine our government's regulatory agencies' ability to hold corporations accountable. What is the Chevron Decision and how could it impact your safety and well-being? In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court ruled against energy giant, Chevron, who challenged the Clean-Air Act, and instructed lower courts to defer to federal agencies when laws passed by Congress are not crystal clear. The 40-year-old decision has been the basis for upholding thousands of regulations by dozens of federal agencies, but has long been a target of conservatives and business groups who argue that it grants too much power to the executive branch, or what some critics call the administrative state. In the decades following the ruling, Chevron has been a bedrock of modern administrative law, requiring judges to defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of congressional statutes. But the current high court, with a 6-3 conservative majority has been increasingly skeptical of the powers of federal agencies. With a closely divided Congress, presidential administrations have increasingly turned to federal regulation to implement policy changes. Federal rules impact virtually every aspect of everyday life, from the food we eat and the cars we drive to the air we breathe and homes we live in. For example, the Biden administration has issued a whole host of new regulations on the environment, including restrictions from emissions at power plants and from vehicle tailpipes. Those actions and others could be opened up to legal challenges if judges are allowed to discount or disregard the expertise of the executive-branch agencies that put them into place. When you consider who was advocating for the overturn of Chevron, it does not bode well for consumers and their safety: groups representing the gun industry and other businesses such as tobacco, agriculture, timber and homebuilding, were among those pressing the justices to overturn the Chevron doctrine and weaken government regulation. Can you imagine the FDA being defanged by Chevron-influenced lawsuits to the point where tobacco could sell their products to teens or resume advertising on television, a practice banned by Congress since 1970. Or imagine OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) regulations being stripped away that protect worker safety? Or a CPSC (Consumer Product Safety Commission) challenged on its stringent toy regulations that are aimed at infant choking hazards? Or a Department of Agriculture no longer able to inspect meat with the rigor that industry now faces? Or a NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) no longer able to regulate the safety of our automobiles, especially now as we address the feasibility and safety of self-driving vehicles?
By Gerald Holdhaber July 16, 2024
CNN recently featured its medical expert, neurologist Sanjay Gupta, narrating a very thorough documentary entitled "The Last Alzheimer's Patient" which, over a 5 year period, collected data on the latest research related to dementia, highlighting advances in new medications as well as in lifestyle changes, both of which offer promising developments that may, in some cases, reverse or, at least stop the advance of Alzheimer's, the most common form of dementia. What is Alzheimer's Disease (AD)? According to the Yale School of Medicine, AD "is a progressive disorder that damages and destroys nerve cells in the brain. Over time, the disease leads to a gradual loss of cognitive functions, including the ability to remember, reason, use language, and recognize familiar places. It can also cause a range of behavioral changes."
By Gerald Goldhaber June 6, 2024
The following story is from one of my cases. I have changed the names to protect my client's identity.
Show More